Project summary: 

Media and strategic communication have played a primary role in anchoring CSG in the public agenda. The School of Journalism & Communication (UQ) undertook a scoping study in early 2013 to investigate the impacts of stakeholder-driven strategic communication on public discourse and media coverage of CSG.

This investigation included analysis of 5,170 news reports from 32 sources published from 2008 to April 2013. In addition, relevant public and academic literature were reviewed and media statements from key corporations and activities were analysed.

CSG was first highlighted in Australian news headlines as a breakthrough business story—good news in the midst of the global financial crisis that had already overtaken the US and Europe. While the CSG to LNG story retains an important place in the business pages, CSG has been anchored on the public agenda by compulsive media attention—in traditional news media, social media, and entertainment media.

In spite of interest in how CSG is depicted in the media and how industry and other stakeholders communicate about CSG, the review of the public and academic literature revealed that there is no substantive, rigorous and independent research that applies appropriate methodologies to track and evaluate either. There is, however, a wealth of commentary about CSG debate, some of which is informed by informally structured reviews of media coverage and communication tools, such as fact sheets websites and media releases.

The original investigation found:

  1. More than 50% of media coverage was generated by just 4 news organisations (Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Australian Financial Review, Australian Associated Press, The Australian)
  2. Initial media coverage (2008) focused on capital investment and job opportunities, however by 2010 news coverage of the boom had both escalated and turned more negative, shifting from benefit and opportunity to risks and contention e.g. water and land access.
  3. Analysis of corporate and activist media statements demonstrated a clear contrast in topics and themes: CSG company communications focused on information and community, whereas activist statements contained central themes of government and water.

The research concluded that while CSG companies have reacted to issues emerging in the media, the activists have focused on agenda building—leading the media into covering new issues.

The next phase of research extended the investigation. The research now includes the early years of the industry (1996 – 2008) through to early 2014. It also includes analysis of available digital/social media coverage (to the extent possible) as well as traditional media forms.


Project status: 
Project leader or contact: 
Start date: 
December 2013
Completion date: 
May 2014
Output availability: 
Geological formation: 


  1. A media analysis report regarding CSG media coverage from 1996 to present day.
  2. A prototype ‘information evaluation tool’ to aid independent analysis of multiple CSG information materials.

Magazine Article:

Mitchell, L. Angus, D. (2016) From good news for business to good news for the news business.Unconventional Oil and Gas, 3, 35-39.


This project is now complete. Journal articles have been drafted based on study data.

Resource type: 
Project output: 
Record number: 
This information has been collated by the Centre for Coal Seam Gas. The project summary on this page may be a reproduction or adaptation of the researcher’s own published description of the project, which is generally available via the link to online information located beneath the summary. In other cases, the summary has been provided directly by the researcher or their organisation.